Hold Onto Facts Before Rationalizing the Reading
If you noted that you have no job offers but the text talks about onboarding preparations, or if you said you do not want to reconcile but the interpretation discusses winning someone back, the reading is not seeing deeper into your subconscious. It simply failed to answer your actual conditions. Point out the error clearly rather than rewriting your reality to match the text.
Check the Four Core Fields
Start by checking your main question, your background notes, the card names with their upright or reversed orientations, and the spread positions. If the displayed cards or positions differ from what was drawn, you are dealing with a technical error. If the card data is correct but the written reasoning is irrelevant, it is a content quality issue.
Neither issue should be dismissed with claims that 'you just didn't believe enough.' Correct card data on screen proves the system rendered the draw, but it does not guarantee that the written inference fits your question.
Distinguish Between Descriptions, Assumptions, and Advice
'You always sacrifice yourself for others' is a descriptive claim that requires supporting background. 'If you are usually the one initiating contact, check whether effort is mutual' is a conditional observation. 'Note down two interactions before deciding' is actionable advice.
A descriptive claim made without background cannot be excused simply by adding 'for reference only.' Any advice offered should also explain why it applies to your specific question.
Example: Clarifying Misunderstood Context
Original input: 'I want to change careers, but I have no invitations or interviews yet.' Flawed output: 'Discuss onboarding arrangements with your new manager.' The right correction is returning to the exploratory phase—identifying what aspects of the job you want to explore and where to gather information—rather than simply renaming 'new manager' to 'prospective manager' and keeping the rest of the text.
A new reflection keeps the cards you drew; what actually changes is how your question and context are applied.
Set Aside What Does Not Apply
A reading may contain one useful insight alongside points that miss the mark completely. You can keep only what genuinely aligns with your known facts and current needs. You never have to treat an automated reading as an infallible directive.
However, if the central conclusion relies on a false premise, you should not pick out one pleasing sentence and pretend the rest of the reading is sound.
Provide Actionable Error Feedback
Make a clear note of which field or sentence was off: for instance, an incorrect orientation, ignoring a clear statement like 'do not reconcile,' presenting an unverified guess as fact, or identical text copied from another card. When reaching out through support channels, share only what is necessary without exposing private reports or personal identifiers on public boards.
If you need to report an error or content issue, please use the official contact email listed on our contact page.